Saturday, May 13, 2017

Load test completed!

Passed!

The load testing of my Goat wing was completed today, with a little help from some friends.  This was a 3G static load, not counting the approximate 0.5G of the structure itself.  I'll give the load distribution in a table at the bottom of the post for completeness.

Mary helped me move the equipment to the back yard, set up the test rig (again) and the Goat nose/wing.  We lowered the rig onto the upside down Goat, supporting the gantry with two ladders, tied the water knot at head-height, and then raised the gantry plus Goat back into the air.  Raising was difficult with that much more weight hanging in the balance.

We then moved all the distributed weights out to stage them next to their location, checking each and every jug for correct weight to within a half-ounce.  This task took about a half-hour with two people, and was a surprising amount of walking.


With Goat hanging upside down and staged, Trent and his family came over to help.  We loaded weights in tandem, each placing weight at the same time with a little nod when ready to let go.  We alternated between the leading and trailing edges, usually two leading edge stations, then three trailing edge stations.

About half-way through loading from the root toward the tips, we noticed the trailing edge spar had a noticeable bow to it.  Not unreasonable, but definitely visible.  Nothing looked out of place or any weird sounds, so we finished the loading.

Despite the 75/25 leading to trailing edge distribution, the trailing edge spar had much more visible bend between the strut and root connection.  The leading edge spar did not have appreciable bend, likely supported by the nose flying wires.  This matches the FEA runs from before.

The tips outboard of the strut connection likely bowed up, but were pulled back down by the load.  Looking down the spar showed a distinctive gull-shape on each half.

We let the weights hang for about two minutes, taking several pictures and inspecting the structure for any deformations.  We then took weight off, from the tips toward the root.

After a small celebration that a decade of work passed its 3G load test, we looked over the structure for any permanent deformation.  The compression strut where the wing struts attach has a noticeable bow to it now.  This is the same strut where the aileron slide tube attaches.  The trailing edge strut itself had a bow to it now, almost like the tube separating the leading from trailing edge strut was too long by about a half-inch to inch.  More investigation needed on that one to identify if that's the cause, or it's permanent deformation from the test.  Nothing else was identified visually as deformed.  Even the nose carry-through tube, where all the weight was hanging from the strap, looks fine.



Disassembly was uneventful, other than realizing it will be much harder to do once covered.  The gantry is now dismantled and all those milk jugs are empty and awaiting recycling.

It's fitting that Trent was available to help.  He was the one who helped set up and run the FEA.  Trent's comment was "Looks just like it did in ANSYS."  Thanks man!

3G load distribution
Rib     LE      TE
13      15.9     05.3 (tip)
12      23.3     07.8
11      27.6     09.2
10      30.2     10.1
09      32.0     10.7
08      33.3     11.1
07      34.3     11.4
06      35.0     11.7
05      35.5     11.8
04      35.9     12.0
03      36.1     12.0
02      36.3     12.1
01      36.5     12.2 (root)

2 comments:

CHOPPERGIRL said...

I'd do this but I'd worry about damaging my plane structure.

Unknown said...

Dan, how’s the building going, looking forward to your next post. I’ve been following you since the beginning and hopefully will also start my build later this year. I’m keen to see how you covered the wings. James

Locations of visitors to this page